ccnp switch material

ccnp switch material

Configure VTP, MSTP, NTP, SNMP, and DHCP RELAY on the distribution switch. Configure VTP, NTP, and SNMP on the access switch. Next reboot license Level: entservices int e0/2 access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any License Information for 'WS-X45-SUP7L-E' Two export routers of ISBL and OSBL, 4 firewalls, and OSPF AREA0 between 4 cores. The above architecture is Cisco's most traditional. Of course, the most stable and classic, and my personal favorite architecture, It’s basically can see such architecture in all books. Sure, the traditional architectural advantage is stability but the shortcomings are also obvious that not suitable for the current situation of big data traffic. Therefore, it is also a backward structure. 39 -rwx 1144 May 3 2016 00:14:24 +00:00 FXS1943Q0AC_201605030014224990.lic interface Vlan20 Before I answer this question, I will expand the topic first. Let me talk about my own understanding of the United States and CISCO. The United State is a great country and CISCO is a great country. For example: failover lan interface failover Ethernet0/2 no sh interface Vlan20 slot 0: ASA5510 hw/sw rev (2.0/9.1(5)) status (Up Sys) speed auto The above two commands that the second rule specifies the range that can be converted. Of course, this network segment is enlarged here. Under normal circumstances, it can be enlarged mainly when writing ACL is simpler and it can be written very finely. This is to look at the actual situation when doing NAT Wait, you can see that it is doing end product address conversion. boot-end-marker The above content must be known as a CCIE. If you still feel that the CCIE written exam and CCIE LAB exam are difficult to pass, then join PASSHOT. We will let you more easily to pass the CCIE exam. At the beginning, the switch was a problem and the reason was not found. Later found that it is a power problem so I changed two big 2800W .The power supply is just fine. Note here that under normal circumstances, the engine above SUP7 is recommended to select a power supply above 1400 otherwise there will be some special problems. If it is 2800W,ccnp switch material, a power supply is enough. no sh boot-end-marker A# sh run I in failover access-list 100 permit ip host 192.168.10.2 host 192.168.20.2 int e0/2 ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 Failover mac address Ethernet0/1 0018.1900.4000 0018.1900.4001 I believe that everyone must be familiar with this picture. This is the infrastructure of the most classic F0. In fact, in the real project, the architecture is like this. Note that Cisco's ASA When doing F0, you need to put the interface into the same network segment otherwise it will not succeed. Configure a routing protocol so that the router can access the network segment of the core switch. failover interface ip state 192.168.100.1 255.255 255.0 standby 192.168.100.2 0/1 licenses were existing licenses HSRP is configured on the distribution layer switch according to IP ADDRESS & VLAN Design, and the network segment is advertised to OSPF. // Since all are advertised to OSPF, can you use network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area x? username CISCO privilege 15 password 0 cisco interface Vlan20 At the beginning, the switch was a problem and the reason was not found. Later found that it is a power problem so I changed two big 2800W .The power supply is just fine. Note here that under normal circumstances, the engine above SUP7 is recommended to select a power supply above 1400 otherwise there will be some special problems. If it is 2800W, a power supply is enough. int e0/3 Failover unit Primary This architecture diagram has been updated in the above architecture. As you can see, this diagram is actually the most ideal architectural design for a campus network. In fact, when designing an enterprise, you can also refer to the design of this architecture. router ospf 1 CCCCC 4507B#copy usb0:/cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.08.01.E.152-4.El.bin bootflash:/ access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption The quality of CISCO equipment and work is great. This is consistent with their design philosophy. It is worth to learning and admiring. It can be. Said that the future will be led by the CISCO giant. Network communication that the following two sets of data may explain the situation. Everyone notices that the performance parameters of all US products are true and effective. It cannot be faked and won’t be falsified otherwise it will be severely punished. Many non-CISCO equipment performance parameters are fake, basically in the factory trademark matching parameters. The left and right can basically reflect its real performance. You can see some equipment performance are dozens of tens of T up and down but after the real data on T, there will be strange problems so I won't say much here. It is really deserves to be admired that the essence of CISCO’s equipment is good with quality and standards.